Backed by Data, Not Bias: The Case for Funding Female Founders

Author name

In 2023, startups with all-female founding teams received just 2% of total venture capital funding globally, despite clear evidence that female-led companies often outperform their male-led counterparts in key business metrics.[1]  The gender gap in startup financing isn't just a diversity issue, it's a business inefficiency. For Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs), especially those led by women, understanding the dynamics behind this disparity is key to building resilience and driving change.


The Funding Disparity: 


Despite increasing attention to gender equity, female founders continue to face significant funding hurdles. Compared to all-male teams, women-led businesses:


  • Receive significantly less funding at both early and growth stages.
  • Are more likely to be asked risk-averse questions by investors. [2]
  • Often lack access to the same financial networks and mentorship channels.


Studies show that female founders are more likely to bootstrap their businesses or rely on personal savings. These barriers slow growth and limit access to essential resources.


The Business Case for Investing in Women


The underfunding of female founders isn’t just unjust, it’s economically shortsighted:


  • Startups founded and co-founded by women generate 10% more cumulative revenue over five years.[3]
  • Women-led companies deliver higher returns per dollar invested (78 cents of revenue per dollar invested, as opposed to just 31 cents for those led by men).
  • Diverse leadership teams drive innovation and are better aligned with today’s diverse consumer base.


In other words, backing female founders is a sound business strategy with proven returns.


Real-World Examples of Female Founders Breaking Barriers


Whitney Wolfe Herd – Bumble (USA)


After leaving Tinder, Wolfe Herd launched Bumble with a mission to put women first in the dating world. She took the company public in 2021, becoming the youngest self-made female billionaire in the U.S. at the time of Bumble’s IPO.
[4]


Anne Boden – Starling Bank (UK)


Founder of Starling Bank, Anne Boden built one of the UK’s top digital challenger banks. While facing resistance from traditional investors early on, she scaled the company to over three million customer accounts and profitability by 2022.
[5]


Melanie Perkins – Canva (Australia)


Melanie Perkins co-founded Canva after facing multiple rejections from investors early in her entrepreneurial journey. She grew it from a bootstrapped startup into a global design leader. Today, Canva is valued at over $40 billion and is celebrated for its inclusive leadership, with gender balance embedded across the executive team
[6]


What Female Founders Can Do


While structural barriers persist, female founders can proactively increase their chances of success:


  • Tap into Women-Focused Funds: Explore platforms like All Raise, Female Founders Fund, and Coralus (formerly known as SheEO) that prioritize gender-diverse investments.
  • Perfect Your Pitch: Tailor pitch decks with strong financials and growth metrics. Anticipate investor concerns and respond with data.
  • Seek Alternative Funding: Consider grants, crowdfunding, and non-dilutive options like revenue-based financing.
  • Build Advisory Networks: Connect with mentors and advisors who understand the fundraising landscape and can open doors.


At Creativa, we are focused on technical market research, strategic planning, and capital advisory; and can help bridge the knowledge and access gap female founders often face.


Rethinking Capital, Rewriting the Norm


The gender funding gap won’t close overnight, but we can accelerate progress with intentional action. Supporting women-led businesses isn’t just about fairness, it’s about unlocking untapped innovation and value.


As financial advisors to growing companies, we encourage female founders to reach out for support on funding strategy, growth planning, and financial analysis. The future is diverse, and it’s already underway.





Sources:


[1] https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/03/women-startups-vc-funding/

[2] https://www.cems.org/news-events/news/investigating-gender-gap-early-stage-funding

[3] https://web-assets.bcg.com/img-src/BCG-Why-Women-Owned-Startups-Are-a-Better-Bet-May-2018-NL_tcm9-193585.pdf

[4] https://www.forbes.com/profile/whitney-wolfe-herd/

[5] https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/the-journey-of-building-a-neobank-from-the-ground-up

[6] https://fortune.com/longform/melanie-perkins-canva-founder-ceo-interview/

By looka_production_81096935 August 22, 2025
Recalculate competitiveness under the 15% tariff floor : Asian firms routing goods through Europe into the U.S. will see cost structures shift — requiring price reviews, contract renegotiations, and margin recalibration. Utilize carve-outs to strengthen positioning: Zero-for-zero tariffs on semiconductors, chemicals, and aircraft parts create opportunities for Asian exporters integrated into these global value chains, while sectors like steel and aluminum will need defensive strategies to stay viable. Build resilience for future tariff cycles: With steel, autos, and agri-food still in the spotlight, Asian SMEs should scenario-test for renewed tariff escalation and invest in near-shoring or alternative routing to maintain market access.
By looka_production_81096935 August 8, 2025
“Land-grab” expansion without guardrails nearly blew up the balance sheet. Chasing market share across dozens of countries helped drive 22% revenue growth in FY2024, but also fueled a €2.3 billion net loss in FY2023, showing that scale at any cost can undermine corporate health. Ad hoc exits magnified the pain. The abrupt halt of the $950 million Foodpanda Taiwan sale and the collapse of Southeast Asia divestment talks not only triggered share-price drops but also pulled focus from core growth initiatives. Surgical market pruning unlocked the real turnaround. By pulling back from loss-making markets and enforcing strict unit-economics, Delivery Hero slashed net losses by 62% and nearly tripled adjusted EBITDA to €750 million in FY2024 proving disciplined capital allocation trumps unchecked scale.
By looka_production_81096935 June 27, 2025
In June 2020, Wirecard AG, once a celebrated German fintech company, collapsed after revealing that €1.9 billion was missing from its accounts, a sum that likely never existed. [1] This event marked one of Europe's most significant corporate frauds, highlighting critical lessons for SMEs and scale-ups about the importance of internal controls and independent audits. How The Fintech Giant Crumbled Under Scrutiny Founded in 1999, Wirecard grew rapidly to become a leading player in the digital payments industry. By 2018, it was valued at €22–24 billion and had secured a spot on Germany’s prestigious DAX 30 index. [2] Its share price soared from €17 in 2013 to a peak of €135 in 2018 [3] , reflecting strong investor confidence. Yet beneath this apparent success lay an intricate web of fraud. A series of investigations that took place between 2018 and 2020 revealed that Wirecard had been inflating its revenue and assets through fictitious transactions and non-existent cash balances. A significant portion of its reported profits from 2016 to 2018 could not be substantiated. [4] The Unfolding Scandal On June 18 th , 2020, Wirecard admitted that €1.9 billion (around a quarter of its total balance sheet) was missing [5] . This cash was supposedly held in trustee accounts in Asia, but auditors couldn’t verify its existence. The company quickly filed for insolvency, making it the first DAX 30 company to ever do so. [6] Wirecard’s share price collapsed by more than 98%, falling from over €100 to less than €2 within days. [7] CNBC reported an over 60% crash in share price immediately after the announcement. [8] On 26 June 2020, shares opened at €2.35, marking a 97% drop since news of the fraud broke. [9] The scandal exposed significant failures in corporate governance, audit, and regulatory oversight. Wirecard's long-time auditor, Ernst & Young (EY), faced criticism for not detecting the fraud earlier. A review found that EY's audit work was marred by "grave" and "repeated" violations of professional duties. [10] In 2023, Germany’s auditor supervisory authority APAS fined EY €500,000 and imposed a two-year ban from accepting new audit mandates for public interest entities in Germany. Lessons for SMEs and Scale-Ups The Wirecard collapse wasn’t just a corporate failure—it was a systemic breakdown. It reminds us that growth without guardrails is dangerous. Four key takeaways: Internal controls aren’t optional : Rapid expansion must be matched by rigorous internal systems. Weak oversight creates room for misconduct. Auditors must be truly independent : External audits are only as effective as they are objective. Independence, competence, and skepticism are non-negotiable. Transparency builds resilience : Clear, consistent financial reporting isn’t just good practice—it’s a defense against deception and a signal to investors that management can be trusted. Regulators matter : When enforcement lags behind innovation, bad actors find loopholes. Robust regulatory frameworks must evolve with the market. Tools SMEs Can Use to Prevent Similar Failures Wirecard Was a Giant. The Lesson Applies to Everyone. Wirecard’s implosion wasn’t just about fraud—it was about systems that didn’t ask hard questions until it was too late. Most SMEs won’t make headlines if things go wrong, but the consequences can still be existential. The good news: the right tools exist, and they’re no longer out of reach. Start with clean, real-time data. Cloud platforms like Xero, QuickBooks, and Zoho Books give you instant visibility into your numbers. Audit trails and automated reconciliations aren’t just for show—they’re your first line of defence. Control spending before it spirals. Ramp, Spendesk, ApprovalMax—these tools let you build in approvals and set boundaries, even in small teams. Governance doesn’t need to mean bureaucracy. Get a second opinion. Virtual CFO services like Pilot offer monthly reviews and external oversight without the overhead of a full finance team. It’s the kind of objective input that catches issues early. Stay on top of risk. Vanta, LogicGate, BoardPro—they make it easier to manage compliance, prepare for audits, and keep your board in the loop. Governance doesn’t need to be complicated, but it does need to exist. Track what matters. Dashboards from Fathom, LivePlan, and Jirav help you keep an eye on burn, liabilities, and cash flow. Not every red flag is obvious—until it is. Wirecard wasn’t lacking in resources—it was lacking in rigour. That’s the part every growing business should pay attention to. It’s not about playing it safe. It’s about building something that can stand up to scrutiny. Sources: [1] https://www.straitstimes.com/business/banking/wirecard-whistleblower-tipped-german-watchdog-in-early-2019 [2] https://www.reprisk.com/insights/case-studies/wirecard [3] https://leap.luiss.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/WP5.21-The-Wirecard-scandal-and-the-role-of-Bafin.pdf [4] https://www.wirecard.com/uploads/Bericht_Sonderpruefung_KPMG_EN_200501_Disclaimer.pdf [5] https://www.bbc.com/news/business-53132953 [6] https://leap.luiss.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/WP5.21-The-Wirecard-scandal-and-the-role-of-Bafin.pdf [7] https://www.aidf.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Wirecard-The-Rise-and-Fall-of-a-Fintech-Giant-in-Asia-BT.pdf [8] https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/18/wirecard-shares-plummet-as-payments-firm-postpones-annual-report.html [9] https://www.ig.com/sg/news-and-trade-ideas/how-wirecard-erased-nearly-all-of-its-market-cap-in-one-week-200626 [10] https://www.mcmillanwoods.com/2024/04/16/german-watchdog-finds-eys-wirecard-audits-grossly-negligent/